From patchwork Thu May 11 12:39:42 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Adolf Belka X-Patchwork-Id: 6859 Return-Path: Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (mail01.haj.ipfire.org [172.28.1.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (Client CN "mail01.haj.ipfire.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by web04.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QHBLL35RFz3wlf for ; Thu, 11 May 2023 12:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail02.haj.ipfire.org (mail02.haj.ipfire.org [172.28.1.201]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (Client CN "mail02.haj.ipfire.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QHBLJ0FRpz1NC; Thu, 11 May 2023 12:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail02.haj.ipfire.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QHBLH4dljz30Hc; Thu, 11 May 2023 12:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (mail01.haj.ipfire.org [172.28.1.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (Client CN "mail01.haj.ipfire.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QHBLG1zs3z2y1C for ; Thu, 11 May 2023 12:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QHBLF6LgLzsQ; Thu, 11 May 2023 12:39:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003ed25519; t=1683808790; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dlkI6R7YgeHYVyC/Ra309drR1dc6FMkR+cGeDxutUZY=; b=fnvnRpU1kxssND0Iv98CpDhGAWRiVYr3jJORNQfhrhp+f6mjivYiT1AV7ovG09kyo4MHTA gyhBCcP3z0liGNDA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003rsa; t=1683808790; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dlkI6R7YgeHYVyC/Ra309drR1dc6FMkR+cGeDxutUZY=; b=B1lOpCu2LtzC59/5o3tMtsR02ThaNRt21PVv3R4oalTsoY0xtOPA+gsiPq2buyxLO+JgX5 PuGPQmwMYe0A+IZ+GgclrG1XFyz00qz3mOzvgQUrhbGn2vvIyugsNh1VVRUc64bxxbAbcN nbrq4iuhdV6uwG+RA8TOvlIWVTJuInBmsfuZQA30DwWEJ+d5uVzMjqVy0BdpQrvSH81QMc rSV514e6S0FBTVvu33xM4sApcwESUF0UiJ4M4lS0tR4RjL9dsCFd2g3aNhBIjxJzwKCUJ7 tzd6G0npbsvARYtz/U0JSIGx4ficTxhD7eRg4r1C1A6me+vxqaUv3NF4luDSvQ== From: Adolf Belka To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: [PATCH] mpfr: Update to include the latest four bug patches Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 14:39:42 +0200 Message-Id: <20230511123943.3450454-2-adolf.belka@ipfire.org> In-Reply-To: <20230511123943.3450454-1-adolf.belka@ipfire.org> References: <20230511123943.3450454-1-adolf.belka@ipfire.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: development@lists.ipfire.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFire development talk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: development-bounces@lists.ipfire.org Sender: "Development" - The base version has not changed but patches to fix 4 bugs have been released. - Update to rootfile not required. - Bug fix changelog 1 A test of the thousands separator in tsprintf.c is based on the output from the GNU C Library up to 2.36, which is incorrect. The output has changed in 2.37 (partly fixed), so that tsprintf fails with glibc 2.37. The tsprintf-thousands patch modifies the test to conform to POSIX and also avoid the buggy case in 2.36 and below. However, this new test, which was expected to succeed, triggers a serious bug in 2.37 (bug 30068 / CVE-2023-25139). We did not modify the test again since this bug affects MPFR's mpfr_sprintf function, with a possible buffer overflow in particular cases. This bug has been fixed in the 2.37 branch. In short, this patch is useful (and needed) for a fixed glibc 2.37 and some other libraries, depending on the current locales. Corresponding changesets in the 4.2 branch: 4f03d40b5, 78ff7526d, e66bb7121. 2 The mpfr_ui_pow_ui function has infinite loop in case of overflow. This can affect mpfr_log10, which uses this function (this is how this bug was found). This bug is fixed by the ui_pow_ui-overflow patch (with testcases). Corresponding changeset in the 4.2 branch: 0216f40ed. 3 The tfprintf and tprintf tests may fail in locales where decimal_point has several bytes, such as ps_AF. This is fixed by the multibyte-decimal_point patch, which makes the tests aware of the length of decimal_point. Corresponding changeset in the 4.2 branch: 0383bea85. 4 In particular cases that are very hard to round, mpfr_rec_sqrt may yield a stack overflow due to many small allocations in the stack, based on alloca(). This is due to the fact that the working precision is increased each step (Ziv loop) by 32 or 64 bits only, until the approximate result can be rounded (thus we have an arithmetic progression here, while a geometric progression is used for the other functions), and that at each iteration, the previous allocations in the stack cannot be freed. Individual allocations in the stack are limited to 16384 bytes, so that the issue can occur only when there are many iterations in working precisions that are not too large, which is possible with an arithmetic progression. This bug is fixed by the rec_sqrt-zivloop patch, which changes the Ziv loop to use the standard MPFR_ZIV_* macros; the patch also provides a testcase obtained by a function that constructs a hard-to-round case involving large enough precisions (this function is commonly used in the MPFR testsuite, but not with so large precisions). This bug was originally reported by Fredrik Johansson. Corresponding changeset in the 4.2 branch: 934dd8842. Signed-off-by: Adolf Belka --- lfs/mpfr | 8 +- ...mpfr-4.2.0-cumulative-patches-1-to-4.patch | 521 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 525 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 src/patches/mpfr-4.2.0-cumulative-patches-1-to-4.patch diff --git a/lfs/mpfr b/lfs/mpfr index 818566390..c799086d9 100644 --- a/lfs/mpfr +++ b/lfs/mpfr @@ -70,10 +70,10 @@ $(subst %,%_BLAKE2,$(objects)) : $(TARGET) : $(patsubst %,$(DIR_DL)/%,$(objects)) @$(PREBUILD) @rm -rf $(DIR_APP) && cd $(DIR_SRC) && tar axf $(DIR_DL)/$(DL_FILE) -# No patches yet for version 4.2.0 -# cd $(DIR_APP) && patch -Np1 < $(DIR_SRC)/src/patches/mpfr-4.1.1-cumulative-patches-1-to-1.patch - cd $(DIR_APP) && $(CONFIGURE_ARGS) ./configure --prefix=/usr \ - --enable-thread-safe + cd $(DIR_APP) && patch -Np1 < $(DIR_SRC)/src/patches/mpfr-4.2.0-cumulative-patches-1-to-4.patch + cd $(DIR_APP) && $(CONFIGURE_ARGS) ./configure \ + --prefix=/usr \ + --enable-thread-safe cd $(DIR_APP) && make $(MAKETUNING) cd $(DIR_APP) && make install @rm -rf $(DIR_APP) diff --git a/src/patches/mpfr-4.2.0-cumulative-patches-1-to-4.patch b/src/patches/mpfr-4.2.0-cumulative-patches-1-to-4.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e12ed4708 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/patches/mpfr-4.2.0-cumulative-patches-1-to-4.patch @@ -0,0 +1,521 @@ +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES 2023-04-17 21:17:39.748645280 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES 2023-04-17 21:17:39.792645218 +0000 +@@ -0,0 +1 @@ ++tsprintf-thousands +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION 2023-01-06 10:55:57.000000000 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION 2023-04-17 21:17:39.792645218 +0000 +@@ -1 +1 @@ +-4.2.0 ++4.2.0-p1 +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h 2023-01-06 10:55:57.000000000 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h 2023-04-17 21:17:39.788645224 +0000 +@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ + #define MPFR_VERSION_MAJOR 4 + #define MPFR_VERSION_MINOR 2 + #define MPFR_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL 0 +-#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0" ++#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p1" + + /* User macros: + MPFR_USE_FILE: Define it to make MPFR define functions dealing +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c 2023-01-06 10:55:57.000000000 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c 2023-04-17 21:17:39.792645218 +0000 +@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@ + const char * + mpfr_get_version (void) + { +- return "4.2.0"; ++ return "4.2.0-p1"; + } +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tsprintf.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tsprintf.c +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tsprintf.c 2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tsprintf.c 2023-04-17 21:17:39.784645229 +0000 +@@ -1715,7 +1715,25 @@ + check_sprintf ("000000001,000", "%'013.4Rg", x); + + #ifdef PRINTF_GROUPFLAG +- check_vsprintf ("+01,234,567 :", "%0+ -'13.10Pd:", (mpfr_prec_t) 1234567); ++ /* Do not test the thousands separator with a precision field larger ++ than the number of digits (thus needing leading zeros), such as ++ "%0+ -'13.10Pd:" (used up to MPFR 4.2.0), since the GNU libc is ++ buggy: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23432 ++ We don't know about the other implementations. ++ This new test works fine with glibc up to 2.36, but fails with 2.37 ++ (as reported by Klaus Dittrich in the MPFR mailing-list); this is ++ actually a bug introduced in glibc 2.37, not in MPFR: ++ https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30068 ++ Since this bug can yield a buffer overflow (CVE-2023-25139), possibly ++ affecting MPFR users, let us rather require a fix in glibc. This bug ++ has been fixed in the 2.37 branch: ++ https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=07b9521fc6 ++ If we wanted to check that and avoid a failure of the test because of ++ a buggy C library (while MPFR would be consistent with the C library), ++ we could compare the MPFR output with both the correct output and the ++ output from the C library (possibly buggy). But to do that in a clean ++ way, this would require a change in the check_vsprintf() call. */ ++ check_vsprintf ("+1,234,567 :", "%0+ -'13Pd:", (mpfr_prec_t) 1234567); + #endif + + mpfr_clear (x); +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES 2023-04-17 21:18:00.464616127 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES 2023-04-17 21:18:00.512616059 +0000 +@@ -0,0 +1 @@ ++ui_pow_ui-overflow +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION 2023-04-17 21:17:39.792645218 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION 2023-04-17 21:18:00.512616059 +0000 +@@ -1 +1 @@ +-4.2.0-p1 ++4.2.0-p2 +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h 2023-04-17 21:17:39.788645224 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h 2023-04-17 21:18:00.508616065 +0000 +@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ + #define MPFR_VERSION_MAJOR 4 + #define MPFR_VERSION_MINOR 2 + #define MPFR_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL 0 +-#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p1" ++#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p2" + + /* User macros: + MPFR_USE_FILE: Define it to make MPFR define functions dealing +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/ui_pow_ui.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/ui_pow_ui.c +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/ui_pow_ui.c 2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/ui_pow_ui.c 2023-04-17 21:18:00.504616070 +0000 +@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ + #include "mpfr-impl.h" + + int +-mpfr_ui_pow_ui (mpfr_ptr x, unsigned long int y, unsigned long int n, ++mpfr_ui_pow_ui (mpfr_ptr x, unsigned long int k, unsigned long int n, + mpfr_rnd_t rnd) + { + mpfr_exp_t err; +@@ -35,22 +35,28 @@ + MPFR_ZIV_DECL (loop); + MPFR_SAVE_EXPO_DECL (expo); + ++ MPFR_LOG_FUNC ++ (("k=%lu n=%lu rnd=%d", k, n, rnd), ++ ("y[%Pu]=%.*Rg inexact=%d", ++ mpfr_get_prec (x), mpfr_log_prec, x, inexact)); ++ + if (MPFR_UNLIKELY (n <= 1)) + { + if (n == 1) +- return mpfr_set_ui (x, y, rnd); /* y^1 = y */ ++ return mpfr_set_ui (x, k, rnd); /* k^1 = k */ + else +- return mpfr_set_ui (x, 1, rnd); /* y^0 = 1 for any y */ ++ return mpfr_set_ui (x, 1, rnd); /* k^0 = 1 for any k */ + } +- else if (MPFR_UNLIKELY (y <= 1)) ++ else if (MPFR_UNLIKELY (k <= 1)) + { +- if (y == 1) ++ if (k == 1) + return mpfr_set_ui (x, 1, rnd); /* 1^n = 1 for any n > 0 */ + else + return mpfr_set_ui (x, 0, rnd); /* 0^n = 0 for any n > 0 */ + } + +- for (size_n = 0, m = n; m; size_n++, m >>= 1); ++ for (size_n = 0, m = n; m != 0; size_n++, m >>= 1) ++ ; + + MPFR_SAVE_EXPO_MARK (expo); + prec = MPFR_PREC (x) + 3 + size_n; +@@ -60,23 +66,55 @@ + for (;;) + { + int i = size_n; ++ unsigned int inex_res; + +- inexact = mpfr_set_ui (res, y, MPFR_RNDU); ++ inex_res = mpfr_set_ui (res, k, MPFR_RNDU); + err = 1; + /* now 2^(i-1) <= n < 2^i: i=1+floor(log2(n)) */ + for (i -= 2; i >= 0; i--) + { +- inexact |= mpfr_sqr (res, res, MPFR_RNDU); ++ inex_res |= mpfr_sqr (res, res, MPFR_RNDU); + err++; + if (n & (1UL << i)) +- inexact |= mpfr_mul_ui (res, res, y, MPFR_RNDU); ++ inex_res |= mpfr_mul_ui (res, res, k, MPFR_RNDU); + } ++ ++ if (MPFR_UNLIKELY (MPFR_IS_INF (res))) ++ { ++ mpfr_t kf; ++ mpz_t z; ++ int size_k; ++ MPFR_BLOCK_DECL (flags); ++ ++ /* Let's handle the overflow by calling mpfr_pow_z. ++ Alternatively, we could call mpfr_pow_ui; this would ++ need a bit shorter code below, but mpfr_pow_ui handles ++ the overflow by calling mpfr_pow_z, so that calling ++ mpfr_pow_z directly should be a bit more efficient. */ ++ ++ MPFR_ZIV_FREE (loop); ++ mpfr_clear (res); ++ for (size_k = 0, m = k; m != 0; size_k++, m >>= 1) ++ ; ++ mpfr_init2 (kf, size_k); ++ inexact = mpfr_set_ui (kf, k, MPFR_RNDN); ++ MPFR_ASSERTD (inexact == 0); ++ mpz_init (z); ++ mpz_set_ui (z, n); ++ MPFR_BLOCK (flags, inexact = mpfr_pow_z (x, kf, z, rnd);); ++ mpz_clear (z); ++ mpfr_clear (kf); ++ MPFR_SAVE_EXPO_UPDATE_FLAGS (expo, flags); ++ goto end; ++ } ++ + /* since the loop is executed floor(log2(n)) times, + we have err = 1+floor(log2(n)). + Since prec >= MPFR_PREC(x) + 4 + floor(log2(n)), prec > err */ + err = prec - err; + +- if (MPFR_LIKELY (inexact == 0 ++ MPFR_LOG_VAR (res); ++ if (MPFR_LIKELY (!inex_res + || MPFR_CAN_ROUND (res, err, MPFR_PREC (x), rnd))) + break; + +@@ -90,6 +128,7 @@ + + mpfr_clear (res); + ++ end: + MPFR_SAVE_EXPO_FREE (expo); + return mpfr_check_range (x, inexact, rnd); + } +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c 2023-04-17 21:17:39.792645218 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c 2023-04-17 21:18:00.512616059 +0000 +@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@ + const char * + mpfr_get_version (void) + { +- return "4.2.0-p1"; ++ return "4.2.0-p2"; + } +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tlog10.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tlog10.c +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tlog10.c 2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tlog10.c 2023-04-17 21:18:00.504616070 +0000 +@@ -49,6 +49,60 @@ + #define TEST_RANDOM_POS 8 + #include "tgeneric.c" + ++/* On 2023-02-13, one gets an infinite loop in mpfr_log10 on both ++ 32-bit and 64-bit hosts when the precision is not large enough ++ (precision 12 and below). */ ++static void ++bug20230213 (void) ++{ ++ mpfr_exp_t old_emin, old_emax, e; ++ mpfr_t t, x, y0, y1, y2; ++ int prec; ++ ++ old_emin = mpfr_get_emin (); ++ old_emax = mpfr_get_emax (); ++ ++ set_emin (MPFR_EMIN_MIN); ++ set_emax (MPFR_EMAX_MAX); ++ e = mpfr_get_emax () - 1; ++ ++ /* The precisions of t and y0 should be large enough to avoid ++ a hard-to-round case for the target precisions. */ ++ mpfr_inits2 (64, t, y0, (mpfr_ptr) 0); ++ mpfr_set_exp_t (y0, e, MPFR_RNDN); ++ mpfr_log_ui (t, 10, MPFR_RNDN); ++ mpfr_div (y0, y0, t, MPFR_RNDN); ++ mpfr_log_ui (t, 2, MPFR_RNDN); ++ mpfr_mul (y0, y0, t, MPFR_RNDN); ++ ++ for (prec = 16; prec >= MPFR_PREC_MIN; prec--) ++ { ++ mpfr_inits2 (prec, x, y1, y2, (mpfr_ptr) 0); ++ mpfr_set (y1, y0, MPFR_RNDN); ++ ++ mpfr_set_ui_2exp (x, 1, e, MPFR_RNDN); ++ mpfr_log10 (y2, x, MPFR_RNDN); ++ MPFR_ASSERTN (MPFR_IS_PURE_FP (y2)); ++ MPFR_ASSERTN (MPFR_IS_POS (y2)); ++ ++ if (! mpfr_equal_p (y1, y2)) ++ { ++ printf ("Error in bug20230213.\n"); ++ printf ("Expected "); ++ mpfr_dump (y1); ++ printf ("Got "); ++ mpfr_dump (y2); ++ exit (1); ++ } ++ mpfr_clears (x, y1, y2, (mpfr_ptr) 0); ++ } ++ ++ mpfr_clears (t, y0, (mpfr_ptr) 0); ++ ++ set_emin (old_emin); ++ set_emax (old_emax); ++} ++ + int + main (int argc, char *argv[]) + { +@@ -112,6 +166,8 @@ + mpfr_clear (x); + mpfr_clear (y); + ++ bug20230213 (); ++ + data_check ("data/log10", mpfr_log10, "mpfr_log10"); + + tests_end_mpfr (); +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tui_pow.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tui_pow.c +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tui_pow.c 2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tui_pow.c 2023-04-17 21:18:00.504616070 +0000 +@@ -142,6 +142,37 @@ + mpfr_clear (t); + } + ++static void ++huge (void) ++{ ++ mpfr_exp_t old_emin, old_emax; ++ mpfr_t x; ++ ++ old_emin = mpfr_get_emin (); ++ old_emax = mpfr_get_emax (); ++ ++ set_emin (MPFR_EMIN_MIN); ++ set_emax (MPFR_EMAX_MAX); ++ ++ mpfr_init2 (x, 8); ++ ++ /* The purpose of this test is more to check that mpfr_ui_pow_ui ++ terminates (without taking much memory) rather than checking ++ the value of x. On 2023-02-13, the +Inf case was not handled ++ in the Ziv iteration, yielding an infinite loop, affecting ++ mpfr_log10 in particular. See ++ commit 90de094f0d9c309daca707aa227470d810866616 ++ */ ++ mpfr_ui_pow_ui (x, 5, ULONG_MAX, MPFR_RNDN); ++ if (MPFR_EMAX_MAX <= ULONG_MAX) /* true with default _MPFR_EXP_FORMAT */ ++ MPFR_ASSERTN (MPFR_IS_INF (x)); ++ ++ mpfr_clear (x); ++ ++ set_emin (old_emin); ++ set_emax (old_emax); ++} ++ + int + main (int argc, char *argv[]) + { +@@ -180,6 +211,7 @@ + } + + test1 (); ++ huge (); + + { + mpfr_t z, t; +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES 2023-04-17 21:18:26.860579184 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES 2023-04-17 21:18:26.904579122 +0000 +@@ -0,0 +1 @@ ++multibyte-decimal_point +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION 2023-04-17 21:18:00.512616059 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION 2023-04-17 21:18:26.904579122 +0000 +@@ -1 +1 @@ +-4.2.0-p2 ++4.2.0-p3 +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h 2023-04-17 21:18:00.508616065 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h 2023-04-17 21:18:26.900579128 +0000 +@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ + #define MPFR_VERSION_MAJOR 4 + #define MPFR_VERSION_MINOR 2 + #define MPFR_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL 0 +-#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p2" ++#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p3" + + /* User macros: + MPFR_USE_FILE: Define it to make MPFR define functions dealing +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c 2023-04-17 21:18:00.512616059 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c 2023-04-17 21:18:26.904579122 +0000 +@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@ + const char * + mpfr_get_version (void) + { +- return "4.2.0-p2"; ++ return "4.2.0-p3"; + } +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tfprintf.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tfprintf.c +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tfprintf.c 2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tfprintf.c 2023-04-17 21:18:26.896579133 +0000 +@@ -61,6 +61,12 @@ + exit (1); \ + } + ++#if MPFR_LCONV_DPTS ++#define DPLEN ((int) strlen (localeconv()->decimal_point)) ++#else ++#define DPLEN 1 ++#endif ++ + /* limit for random precision in random() */ + const int prec_max_printf = 5000; + +@@ -195,12 +201,12 @@ + lo, &ulo); + check_length (2, ulo, 36, lu); + check_vfprintf (fout, "a. %hi, b. %*f, c. %Re%hn", ush, 3, f, mpfr, &ush); +- check_length (3, ush, 46, hu); ++ check_length (3, ush, 45 + DPLEN, hu); + check_vfprintf (fout, "a. %hi, b. %f, c. %#.2Rf%n", sh, d, mpfr, &i); +- check_length (4, i, 29, d); ++ check_length (4, i, 28 + DPLEN, d); + check_vfprintf (fout, "a. %R*A, b. %Fe, c. %i%zn", rnd, mpfr, mpf, sz, + &sz); +- check_length (5, (unsigned long) sz, 34, lu); /* no format specifier "%zu" in C90 */ ++ check_length (5, (unsigned long) sz, 33 + DPLEN, lu); /* no format specifier "%zu" in C90 */ + check_vfprintf (fout, "a. %Pu, b. %c, c. %Zi%Zn", prec, ch, mpz, &mpz); + check_length_with_cmp (6, mpz, 17, mpz_cmp_ui (mpz, 17), Zi); + check_vfprintf (fout, "%% a. %#.0RNg, b. %Qx%Rn, c. %p", mpfr, mpq, &mpfr, +@@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ + + #ifdef PRINTF_L + check_vfprintf (fout, "a. %RA, b. %Lf, c. %QX%zn", mpfr, ld, mpq, &sz); +- check_length (9, (unsigned long) sz, 30, lu); /* no format specifier "%zu" in C90 */ ++ check_length (9, (unsigned long) sz, 29 + DPLEN, lu); /* no format specifier "%zu" in C90 */ + #endif + + #ifndef NPRINTF_HH +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tprintf.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tprintf.c +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tprintf.c 2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tprintf.c 2023-04-17 21:18:26.896579133 +0000 +@@ -68,6 +68,12 @@ + exit (1); \ + } + ++#if MPFR_LCONV_DPTS ++#define DPLEN ((int) strlen (localeconv()->decimal_point)) ++#else ++#define DPLEN 1 ++#endif ++ + /* limit for random precision in random() */ + const int prec_max_printf = 5000; + /* boolean: is stdout redirected to a file ? */ +@@ -316,11 +322,11 @@ + check_vprintf ("a. %c, b. %Rb, c. %u, d. %li%ln", i, mpfr, i, lo, &ulo); + check_length (2, ulo, 36, lu); + check_vprintf ("a. %hi, b. %*f, c. %Re%hn", ush, 3, f, mpfr, &ush); +- check_length (3, ush, 46, hu); ++ check_length (3, ush, 45 + DPLEN, hu); + check_vprintf ("a. %hi, b. %f, c. %#.2Rf%n", sh, d, mpfr, &i); +- check_length (4, i, 29, d); ++ check_length (4, i, 28 + DPLEN, d); + check_vprintf ("a. %R*A, b. %Fe, c. %i%zn", rnd, mpfr, mpf, sz, &sz); +- check_length (5, (unsigned long) sz, 34, lu); /* no format specifier '%zu' in C90 */ ++ check_length (5, (unsigned long) sz, 33 + DPLEN, lu); /* no format specifier '%zu' in C90 */ + check_vprintf ("a. %Pu, b. %c, c. %RUG, d. %Zi%Zn", prec, ch, mpfr, mpz, &mpz); + check_length_with_cmp (6, mpz, 24, mpz_cmp_ui (mpz, 24), Zi); + check_vprintf ("%% a. %#.0RNg, b. %Qx%Rn c. %p", +@@ -344,7 +350,7 @@ + + #ifdef PRINTF_L + check_vprintf ("a. %RA, b. %Lf, c. %QX%zn", mpfr, ld, mpq, &sz); +- check_length (9, (unsigned long) sz, 30, lu); /* no format specifier '%zu' in C90 */ ++ check_length (9, (unsigned long) sz, 29 + DPLEN, lu); /* no format specifier '%zu' in C90 */ + #endif + + #ifndef NPRINTF_HH +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES 2023-04-17 21:19:01.988530337 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES 2023-04-17 21:19:02.032530276 +0000 +@@ -0,0 +1 @@ ++rec_sqrt-zivloop +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION 2023-04-17 21:18:26.904579122 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION 2023-04-17 21:19:02.032530276 +0000 +@@ -1 +1 @@ +-4.2.0-p3 ++4.2.0-p4 +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h 2023-04-17 21:18:26.900579128 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h 2023-04-17 21:19:02.032530276 +0000 +@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ + #define MPFR_VERSION_MAJOR 4 + #define MPFR_VERSION_MINOR 2 + #define MPFR_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL 0 +-#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p3" ++#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p4" + + /* User macros: + MPFR_USE_FILE: Define it to make MPFR define functions dealing +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/rec_sqrt.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/rec_sqrt.c +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/rec_sqrt.c 2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/rec_sqrt.c 2023-04-17 21:19:02.024530287 +0000 +@@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ + int s, cy, inex; + mpfr_limb_ptr x; + MPFR_TMP_DECL(marker); ++ MPFR_ZIV_DECL (loop); + + MPFR_LOG_FUNC + (("x[%Pu]=%.*Rg rnd=%d", mpfr_get_prec (u), mpfr_log_prec, u, rnd_mode), +@@ -530,6 +531,7 @@ + wp = rp + 11; + if (wp < rn * GMP_NUMB_BITS) + wp = rn * GMP_NUMB_BITS; ++ MPFR_ZIV_INIT (loop, wp); + for (;;) + { + MPFR_TMP_MARK (marker); +@@ -561,8 +563,9 @@ + } + MPFR_TMP_FREE(marker); + +- wp += GMP_NUMB_BITS; ++ MPFR_ZIV_NEXT (loop, wp); + } ++ MPFR_ZIV_FREE (loop); + cy = mpfr_round_raw (MPFR_MANT(r), x, wp, 0, rp, rnd_mode, &inex); + MPFR_EXP(r) = - (MPFR_EXP(u) - 1 - s) / 2; + if (MPFR_UNLIKELY(cy != 0)) +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c 2023-04-17 21:18:26.904579122 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c 2023-04-17 21:19:02.032530276 +0000 +@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@ + const char * + mpfr_get_version (void) + { +- return "4.2.0-p3"; ++ return "4.2.0-p4"; + } +diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/trec_sqrt.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/trec_sqrt.c +--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/trec_sqrt.c 2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000 ++++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/trec_sqrt.c 2023-04-17 21:19:02.028530282 +0000 +@@ -242,6 +242,8 @@ + data_check ("data/rec_sqrt", mpfr_rec_sqrt, "mpfr_rec_sqrt"); + bad_cases (mpfr_rec_sqrt, pm2, "mpfr_rec_sqrt", 0, -256, 255, 4, 128, + 800, 50); ++ bad_cases (mpfr_rec_sqrt, pm2, "mpfr_rec_sqrt", 0, -256, 255, 9999, 9999, ++ 120000, 1); + + end: + tests_end_mpfr ();