From patchwork Mon May 1 19:08:25 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Martin Gebhardt X-Patchwork-Id: 6823 Return-Path: Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (mail01.haj.ipfire.org [172.28.1.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384 client-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-digest SHA384) (Client CN "mail01.haj.ipfire.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by web04.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Q9CSB1QXWz3wlp for ; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail02.haj.ipfire.org (mail02.haj.ipfire.org [172.28.1.201]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384 client-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-digest SHA384) (Client CN "mail02.haj.ipfire.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Q9CS92zPdzQF; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail02.haj.ipfire.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Q9CS91F6kz2xl7; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (mail01.haj.ipfire.org [172.28.1.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (Client CN "mail01.haj.ipfire.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mail02.haj.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Q9CS76YByz2xNd for ; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:09:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.sdf.org (mx.sdf.org [205.166.94.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384 client-signature ECDSA (P-256) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Q9CS061hBzGy for ; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail01.ipfire.org; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=sdf.org header.s=my-selector-name header.b=A9rKFEPy; spf=pass (mail01.ipfire.org: domain of martin@SDF.ORG designates 205.166.94.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=martin@SDF.ORG; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=sdf.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=202003rsa; d=lists.ipfire.org; t=1682968148; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SvYCqNcMtFlBBubkD4xCyEBtyPdGW2HO9yIYoSelUNVR62NYsSHv3FoLn5TAasQ3LTdbCl EkZcn8upOs/I2b8vzffPxVONTwwIidD9jTFzF+wz6UAUnbn+JbifUR19aa3qZbSgIAXNc/ cp8+op4LCE8SxmCUrF1piLfUgr3YFBgdPdq5EU83XTwaZa4yNmbF891+aynocX0mWOCISl F393STq/tKmo2mMRM26IeI6vyI1xvW6JeAOZaY/Nb2CeoGoDV9E4zv1otUkMvKMoHLcQcI FPs7BO0sf2qkG2apANCeqhMfgZ2FLCUeaOfyr9PephHx8Zml1M09rnk5YhGnjA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mail01.ipfire.org; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=sdf.org header.s=my-selector-name header.b=A9rKFEPy; spf=pass (mail01.ipfire.org: domain of martin@SDF.ORG designates 205.166.94.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=martin@SDF.ORG; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=sdf.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.ipfire.org; s=202003rsa; t=1682968148; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:dkim-signature; bh=XpcnG0JRnjpozS6voXxq3QuKFqsbHNDptla8XFjHfm4=; b=NJb7RxE45zkKq++D+W+WsWYmM6HpJ7Y5SwuRkmTM4/A+h37VqhZK9vC24XXbpfT4XeR9RM 8kyl6n+64cMpTE6uwLl2xH1BEtHUChC09r6/6cN6hVaapN9GAYQJQ5NGWTEnvZxRjMxUk1 ApOZIFwN1sQ78sN9dbARmzHMJvfglmIG+sIEmgykCvo0PkY81gNZNRHPztEZhiQpMY+wek uDKSwMiLAtKTTl2A0ZPAgYesRfJrs9EXok3VS64u0ssouEcZUL49T/h3T5Ggc5WAvJEG+V GykuvFkMmvL4EDe7Bu90Rxxpq7xSlXOqRmh307sUcNggegtxA7h9lCUBF9mhcg== Received: from smtpclient.apple (ppp-2-84-81-113.home.otenet.gr [2.84.81.113]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by mx.sdf.org (8.16.1/8.14.5) with ESMTPA id 341J8wos019518 for ; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:09:00 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sdf.org; s=my-selector-name; t=1682968141; bh=6fVzY0+ynkkAIKkDvo6X1Vvcy8vbitf9fP/ddNui2Mg=; h=From:Subject:Date:To; b=A9rKFEPyFA6yrvuOaqqc3kgrHm4UWnMCFtRjdXhGDv+SMxUepdarwbvpNBSQwcHxs zA3vyBm4+NZGMC+xLLXd8TPX3elkPcjUkH4M+vcDhFkPaVbFAkePwUBJoT2vszOEDL ee2iWtU4JzzHZw9UIotS9KWRF6rB1HOMBeox8xbg= From: Martin Gebhardt Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\)) Subject: Please update individual networks Message-Id: Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 22:08:25 +0300 To: location@lists.ipfire.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Q9CS061hBzGy X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.65 / 11.00]; NEURAL_SPAM(2.00)[1.000]; BAYES_HAM(-1.14)[88.56%]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[sdf.org,none]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:205.166.94.0/24]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(-0.01)[asn: 14361(0.00), country: US(-0.01), ip: 205.166.94.24(0.00)]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[location@lists.ipfire.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DKIM_REPUTATION(0.00)[0]; ARC_SIGNED(0.00)[lists.ipfire.org:s=202003rsa:i=1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14361, ipnet:205.166.94.0/24, country:US]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[sdf.org:~]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[2.84.81.113:received]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[sdf.org:s=my-selector-name] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: mail01.haj.ipfire.org X-BeenThere: location@lists.ipfire.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: location-bounces@lists.ipfire.org Sender: "Location" Hello Peter, I noticed while looking through the Tor metrics of my relays that I run at my employer that a few networks can be updated. https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/family:824862C40A81327DE807F44A7DB9827A62B86B57 Can you help again? :-) Reference in order of diff below: 37.252.254.0/24 https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query?searchtext=37.252.254.0%2F24 37.252.255.0/24 https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query?searchtext=37.252.255.0%2F24 217.146.2.0/24 https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query?searchtext=217.146.2.0%2F24 2a00:11c0:1b::/48 https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query?searchtext=2a00:11c0:1b:aa2::5 2a00:11c0:1c::/48 https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query?searchtext=2a00:11c0:1c:311::5 2a00:11c0:1f::/48 https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query?searchtext=2a00:11c0:1f:1::55 When checking the addresses, I also checked rDNS. More than a year ago, you pointed out to me that this is very suboptimal. At that time, I had opened a ticket with our NOC as promised. But unfortunately it's still bad... Partly it works with the addresses mentioned here, and partly it is.. meaningless. I didn't know if this was done in the override config or directly in the database.txt. But maybe it helps. -country: AT +country: UA aut-num: 42473 net: 217.146.4.0/24 @@ -5241785,11 +5241785,11 @@ country: AT aut-num: 42473 net: 2a00:11c0:1b::/48 -country: AT +country: RU aut-num: 42473 net: 2a00:11c0:1c::/48 -country: AT +country: RU aut-num: 42473 net: 2a00:11c0:1d::/48 @@ -5241801,7 +5241801,7 @@ country: AT aut-num: 42473 net: 2a00:11c0:1f::/48 -country: AT +country: UA aut-num: 42473 diff --git a/database.txt b/database.txt index 34ed5d5..85f8e99 100644 --- a/database.txt +++ b/database.txt @@ -585009,11 +585009,11 @@ country: AT aut-num: 42473 net: 37.252.254.0/24 -country: AT +country: RU aut-num: 42473 net: 37.252.255.0/24 -country: AT +country: RU aut-num: 42473 net: 37.253.0.0/16 @@ -4506501,7 +4506501,7 @@ country: AT aut-num: 42473 net: 217.146.2.0/24