bind: Update to 9.11.0-P2
Message ID | 20170114121043.1780-1-matthias.fischer@ipfire.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 3d7f409cba2b94957cc315ecb96522552a4d4f7b |
Headers |
Return-Path: <development-bounces@lists.ipfire.org> Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (unknown [172.28.1.200]) by web02.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9882261C2B for <patchwork@ipfire.org>; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:10:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2355F9E8; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:10:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from Devel.localdomain (p5DD82631.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.216.38.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B064934 for <development@lists.ipfire.org>; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:10:49 +0100 (CET) From: Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer@ipfire.org> To: development@lists.ipfire.org Subject: [PATCH] bind: Update to 9.11.0-P2 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:10:43 +0100 Message-Id: <20170114121043.1780-1-matthias.fischer@ipfire.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 X-BeenThere: development@lists.ipfire.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFire development talk <development.lists.ipfire.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/options/development>, <mailto:development-request@lists.ipfire.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/development/> List-Post: <mailto:development@lists.ipfire.org> List-Help: <mailto:development-request@lists.ipfire.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/development>, <mailto:development-request@lists.ipfire.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: development-bounces@lists.ipfire.org Sender: "Development" <development-bounces@lists.ipfire.org> |
Message
Matthias Fischer
Jan. 14, 2017, 11:10 p.m. UTC
For details see:
https://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.11.0-P2/RELEASE-NOTES-bind-9.11.0-P2.html
"BIND 9.11.0-P2 addresses the security issues described in CVE-2016-9131, CVE-2016-9147,
CVE-2016-9444 and CVE-2016-9778.
...
Security Fixes
A coding error in the nxdomain-redirect feature could lead to an assertion failure if the
redirection namespace was served from a local authoritative data source such as a local zone
or a DLZ instead of via recursive lookup. This flaw is disclosed in CVE-2016-9778. [RT
Named could mishandle authority sections that were missing RRSIGs triggering an assertion
failure. This flaw is disclosed in CVE-2016-9444. [RT # 43632]
Named mishandled some responses where covering RRSIG records are returned without the
requested data resulting in a assertion failure. This flaw is disclosed in CVE-2016-9147.
[RT #43548]
Named incorrectly tried to cache TKEY records which could trigger a assertion failure when
there was a class mismatch. This flaw is disclosed in CVE-2016-9131. [RT #43522]
It was possible to trigger assertions when processing a response. This flaw is disclosed in
CVE-2016-8864. [RT #43465]"
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fischer <matthias.fischer@ipfire.org>
---
lfs/bind | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)